feat(GOV-010): 强制校验开发质量证据
This commit is contained in:
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ const REQUIRED_FEATURE_FILES = Object.freeze([
|
||||
'design.md',
|
||||
'implementation-plan.md',
|
||||
'test-plan.md',
|
||||
'development-summary.md',
|
||||
'gitnexus/before.md',
|
||||
'gitnexus/impact-plan.md',
|
||||
'gitnexus/detected-changes.md',
|
||||
@@ -27,6 +28,28 @@ const REVIEW_FILES = Object.freeze([
|
||||
'review/standards-review.md',
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
const REQUIRED_EVIDENCE_SECTIONS = Object.freeze({
|
||||
'development-summary.md': [
|
||||
'原始开发需求',
|
||||
'需求与范围变化',
|
||||
'实际完成需求',
|
||||
'修复缺陷',
|
||||
'未完成与延期项',
|
||||
'关键提交',
|
||||
'验证证据',
|
||||
],
|
||||
'design.md': ['安全策略与评估', '性能目标与评估'],
|
||||
'test-plan.md': ['安全验证', '性能验证'],
|
||||
'gitnexus/impact-plan.md': ['直接与间接影响', '跨模块同步修改'],
|
||||
'review/code-review.md': ['安全与残余风险', '性能与资源影响', 'GitNexus 与同步修改'],
|
||||
'review/standards-review.md': [
|
||||
'安全、性能与架构检查',
|
||||
'GitNexus 与开发总结检查',
|
||||
],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const EMPTY_EVIDENCE_PATTERN = /^(?:无|不适用|n\/?a|none)[。.!!]?$/i;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* 功能编号是需求、设计、代码提交、测试结果和发布记录之间的主关联键。
|
||||
* 严格限制格式可以避免路径穿越、临时名称以及后续无法检索的模糊编号。
|
||||
@@ -58,6 +81,75 @@ export function getRequiredFeatureFiles() {
|
||||
return [...REQUIRED_FEATURE_FILES];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* 二级标题允许带文档章节序号,但证据名称必须完整匹配,避免靠散文中偶然出现的
|
||||
* “安全”或“性能”字样绕过门禁。正文只剔除空行和 HTML 注释,不推断业务结论真伪。
|
||||
*/
|
||||
function collectSecondLevelSections(content) {
|
||||
const sections = new Map();
|
||||
let currentSection;
|
||||
|
||||
for (const line of String(content).replace(/\r\n?/g, '\n').split('\n')) {
|
||||
const heading = line.match(/^##\s+(?:(?:\d+(?:\.\d+)*)\.\s+)?(.+?)\s*$/);
|
||||
if (heading) {
|
||||
currentSection = heading[1];
|
||||
if (!sections.has(currentSection)) sections.set(currentSection, []);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (currentSection) sections.get(currentSection).push(line);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return sections;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function hasSubstantiveEvidence(lines) {
|
||||
const content = (lines ?? [])
|
||||
.join('\n')
|
||||
.replace(/<!--[\s\S]*?-->/g, '')
|
||||
.trim();
|
||||
return content.length > 0 && !EMPTY_EVIDENCE_PATTERN.test(content);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* 返回全部无效证据而不是遇到首项即停止,使开发者一次即可补齐同一功能档案。
|
||||
* “不适用”必须附带原因和适用边界;有解释的完整句子不会被当作空占位。
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export function getInvalidFeatureEvidence(featureReports) {
|
||||
const invalidEvidence = [];
|
||||
|
||||
for (const [file, requiredSections] of Object.entries(REQUIRED_EVIDENCE_SECTIONS)) {
|
||||
const sections = collectSecondLevelSections(featureReports.get(file) ?? '');
|
||||
for (const section of requiredSections) {
|
||||
if (!hasSubstantiveEvidence(sections.get(section))) {
|
||||
invalidEvidence.push(`${file}:${section}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return invalidEvidence;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** 后续功能的影响计划从完整检查维度起步,减少只分析主模块而遗漏消费者。 */
|
||||
export function buildImpactPlanTemplate(featureId) {
|
||||
if (!validateFeatureId(featureId)) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`功能编号格式无效:${featureId}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return `# GitNexus 开发前影响计划
|
||||
|
||||
- 功能编号:${featureId}
|
||||
- 总体风险:待分析
|
||||
|
||||
## 直接与间接影响
|
||||
|
||||
请记录 query、context、upstream impact、消费者和执行流。
|
||||
|
||||
## 跨模块同步修改
|
||||
|
||||
请逐项判断 HTTP/OpenAPI、Web API、消息契约、数据库、Redis、API、Scheduler、Worker、配置部署、测试和文档。
|
||||
`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Review 报告不能只靠“文件存在”通过门禁。这里要求报告使用固定的最终结论行,
|
||||
* 避免 pending、blocked 或 changes_required 被一段其他说明文字意外判定为通过。
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user